Interview: Bradley Smith, Part 1 - On Bikes, Adapting Riding Styles, And Why MotoGP Aliens Don't Exist

Bradley Smith is perhaps the most eloquent explainer of racing a MotoGP bike in the Grand Prix paddock. The Red Bull KTM rider marries a keen intellect and deeply analytical approach to riding, to a willingness to speak at remarkable length about the nuts and bolts of racing. Those journalists who want to know the hows and the whys of motorcycle racing make a beeline for Smith if they need to understand what is going on out on track.

During his daily 5-minute media debriefs, there is not much time to dive into a subject too deeply. So when I got a chance to conduct a longer interview with Smith, I made the most of it. With the Englishman leaving the Red Bull KTM team at the end of the season, his time is a little less strictly controlled by KTM's PR machine. Which is how I ended up spending over half an hour talking to Smith about a whole range of subjects, and having time to go into them in great depth.

In part 1 of this interview, Smith looks back at his MotoGP career so far, and talks about how different bikes affected his ability to perform. He discusses just how much riders adapt their styles through the course of a weekend, and a race. Taking the example of Jorge Lorenzo's use of the back brake, he explains how he was forced to use the brake to help him get around the limits of MotoGP electronics. And Smith explains to me why he doesn't believe in the concept of MotoGP Aliens, and what Casey Stoner and Marc Márquez are doing which makes them different.

Q: What I want to talk about is basically the technical side of riding. Let's start with how has the sport changed since you've been in the class? You came in on a satellite Yamaha on Bridgestones, and then you switched to Michelins, and then you switched to a factory team on a brand new project. What have you had to learn along the way? How have you had to change your approach, style, everything?

BS: First and foremost, I think I've ridden in every possible circumstance. I turned up in my first year in Grand Prix and was on an old package [2013, with the Tech3 team, on a 2012 Yamaha M1]. Crutchlow, because of his good performance or a couple of strong performances with Yamaha, they used an extra bit of budget to give him the next step of bike. So I rode that year always on one step down of machine. And you were always told, "Oh, it's only 0.2." So you never knew any different. You just kept your head down and so on.

When I did jump on that bike though, I think that was the year that I went second in the winter test and was only like 0.2 behind Marc. Then you suddenly realize that 0.2 is not 0.2 seconds. 0.2 is only 0.2 for a certain style. If all of those bits on that bike tick the feeling that the rider's looking for, then 0.2 can become infinite.

Then [in 2014] obviously being beaten by a rookie [Tech3 teammate Pol Espargaro], so being in that type of situation where he did have a factory contract as well. So then that was another situation where I was kind of always behind the eight ball in terms of what I got. He was always the priority, because he was the guy to go up against Marc Marquez. Totally understandable.

Then finally my third year was the time that I actually had a level playing field in terms of bike, given a great package. Obviously it didn't follow the factory one, but it was already at that high level. Things just clicked that year and everything was hunky-dory. Then the following year they go into a situation where we were riding a Bridgestone bike on Michelin tires, and nothing worked. It wouldn't matter what we did. Nothing seemed to work or this, that and the other.

Then going to KTM. I think the simple situation that you have learned is that there is no beating a bad motorcycle. The conclusion is, it doesn't matter how good you are, because I think the only thing that can make the difference really out there up to a certain level is the motorcycle that you're on. Why? Because I think that we're all within one percent of each other. So no one arrived to this MotoGP level now, I think only except for me and Abraham, without winning a world title. Maybe Rins. He should have been. That basically explains that everyone at some point has been world champion at something that they do.

Q: I don't think there's anyone who hasn't won a Grand Prix on the grid. There might be one person.

BS: Petrucci is the only one I think that's not won a Grand Prix. So there you go. That's the type of level that we're talking about. We're looking at MotoGP now as the best it's ever been. I don't care what anyone says. It is the highest talent level with the most competitive motorcycles. There's obviously down to Dorna and their good strategy. That's the level that we're at.

So the simple thing is there's no out-riding the motorcycle that you're on. So, you have to kind of just do the best that you possibly can. Sometimes that makes you look like a genius, aka [Johann] Zarco from last year, in his rookie season riding circles around multi-world champions and making them look like back markers, to this year kind of settling into a more normal dynamic of where he should be, where we see signs of brilliance but in the racing we don't see him as strong as the other guys. I think then that balances itself out to what we would expect.

To read the rest of this article, you need to sign up to become a MotoMatters.com site supporter by taking out a subscription.


This is part of a regular series of unique insights into the world of motorcycle racing, exclusive for MotoMatters.com site supporters. The series includes interviews, background information, in-depth analysis, and opinion. Though most content on MotoMatters.com remains free to read, a select amount of uniquely interesting content will be made available solely to those who have supported the website financially by taking out a subscription.

The aim is to provide additional value for our growing band of site supporters, providing extra original and exclusive content. If you would like to read more of our exclusive content and help MotoMatters.com to grow and improve, you can join the growing band of site supporters, by taking out a subscription here.

Tweet Button: 
Total votes: 32

Back to top

Comments

Hafizh Syahrin neither. I'm realize I'm being a prick, but the article made the claim...

Total votes: 9

You are absolutely correct. The article is a transcript of an interview I did with Bradley Smith. We got deep into conversation mode, and so were talking without thinking about it too much, and definitely not stopping to look up every statement made. 

I shall add a note to the interview, but Bradley's broader point stands: when almost every rider on the grid is a GP winner, and many are world champions, then the level of talent in the sport is exceptionally high. 

Total votes: 18

Funny, Bradley tell's us he doesn't believe in aliens and than goes on to explain quit accurate why Marc and Casey are aliens ;-)

 

Total votes: 17

Absolutely. I think that Bradley is a great guy but a lot of what is written here makes less than complete sense imo.

Total votes: 8

I understand Brad to be saying he thinks Marc and Casey have acquired and developed their special skills from a very young age, which explains his comment about Aliens. Personally, I think it's a bit of both. You can't learn the skills unless there's something quite exceptional about you. 

Total votes: 8

He clearly acknowledges that there is something special about their talent, just doesn't believe in the term.

"...You can't learn the skills unless there's something quite exceptional about you..." Totally agree, Cloverleaf.

Fantastic interview, looking forward to the next part.

Total votes: 3

A few years ago i was in every garage, getting to talk to every rider (sans Vale/Jorge, they were out promoting for Yamaha and the race).  Bradley was the most eloquent, but also able to compartmentalize riding a current MotoGP bike and explaining it to me/us. He is highly intelligent, well spoken, and a coo for Aprilia to get as a development rider.  I can't speak to his skills on the bike, in terms of outright speed because he's never been on competitive machinery to go for W's.  But he can transmit what the bike is doing, to a t and Aprilia was smart to sign him.  He's also the nicest motorcycle rider I've met in 20+ years.  No ego, like many many others, just a down to Earth guy.  He is a bit like Guy Martin in that way.  He was so cordial to everyone in our group, and took the time to take a pic with every single person there, again with no ego or superstar bs.  Aleix was also quite cordial.  Then a factory duo, oh my, I won't type what I could about them, specifically one of the two, who I was listening to in Spanish when he thought nobody was listening.     

Speaking of people I highly respect.  Where is Dennis Noyes?  Is he even writing for any English outlets in the world today?  I greatly miss his articles and insight.  David, Dennis, and Sir Alan Cathcart.  Does any journalist ride all the bikes after the season like Cathcart did, anymore?

Total votes: 30

I understand points that Brad is wanting to get across, they make sense. I do though see some riders very much change their style. Valentino comes first to mind. I hear some subjective bias that reminds me of Smith's struggle relative to Pol in getting going on the KTM early on. He is not an easy nor fast adapter. And has remained rather terrestrial. There seems to be just a tad of bitterness or resentment here that is quite expected from someone struggling against the unwanted end of their MotoGP tenure. I remember talking w Shakey Byrne while at KTM, and he was openly despairing and flatly pining for a top bike on which he expected he could challenge the front pack. Smelled like Tabasco sauce.

Interested in more. And wishing good things for both Brad and the Aprilia project. Thanks David!

Total votes: 8