Honda Press Release: Interview With Casey Stoner, On The 1000s, Parenthood, Defending Titles And Laguna Seca

The Repsol Honda MotoGP team has a small army of press officers working for them. In addition to the PR person assigned to each rider, as is common for all of the factory MotoGP riders, Honda also has PR people from Spanish petroleum sponsor Repsol, as well as their Honda Pro Racing arm, aimed at providing press information for all of the Japanese giant's racing activities. 

The good news for race fans is that the army of press officers also generate a small mountain of press releases, interviews and other information. Today, Honda provided the transcript of an interview produced with the 2011 World Champion Casey Stoner, conducted during the first Sepang test at the beginning of February. The interview provides a fascinating insight into the mind of the Australian, and his thoughts on racing and life. In the interview, Stoner discusses how the new 1000s are different from the 800s, whether the racing will change much, the challenges he faced defending his first title and interestingly, the differences between his legendary clash with Valentino Rossi at Laguna Seca in 2008, and the move that amazed even Kevin Schwantz, Stoner's pass on Jorge Lorenzo at the terrifying Turn 1 in 2011 at the same circuit.

Below is the interview, in the form of a press release, as issued by the Honda Pro Racing service:


HONDA RACING INFORMATION

CASEY STONER INTERVIEW

Repsol Honda rider Casey Stoner had a dream season in 2011 and 2012 has started out even better.

In his first year as a member of the Repsol Honda team, Stoner was untouchable. Other than being knocked down in the Spanish Grand Prix, Stoner was on the podium in every race. In a 17-race season, he tied the record for pole positions with 12 and won 11 times. The most important victory came in his home grand prix at Phillip Island. In front of his fellow countrymen and family, Stoner closed the 800cc era as he'd opened it, by winning the MotoGP World Championship. Not only did he win the Australian Grand Prix for the fifth time in a row, but he did it on his 26th birthday. The best is surely still to come.

And not only on the race track. Following his dominant performance in the season-opening test in Sepang from Jan. 31 through Feb. 2, Stoner returned to his European base in Lausanne, Switzerland to be with his wife Adriana to await the birth of their first child. At 9:55 p.m. on Feb. 16, Casey and Adriana welcomed their daughter, Alessandra Maria Stoner. Now, after a few weeks of fatherhood, Stoner is preparing to returning to Sepang for the second MotoGP test of the 1000cc era.

The initial preparations were impressive. Stoner missed the opening day of the first three-day Sepang test with the recurrence of a back injury originally suffered at the 2003 125cc Dutch TT. But by the end of day three he'd not only set the fastest time, but he'd done it with an impressive cushion of .591s on the best road racers in the world. Having provided valuable data to the Honda engineers to improve the RC213V, and with nearly a month's rest, Stoner will return to Malaysia even stronger and more determined to continue the work that he hopes will culminate in the first MotoGP World Championship of the new 1000cc era.

The following is an edited transcript of a conversation with the two-time world champion.

Specifically, how is the 1000 different from the 800 on corner entry, mid-corner, exit?

Well, the only thing I think, not so much from the 1000 to 800, but just an improvement that we've made with Honda, is braking stability. The wheelbase is maybe a little different and when we go on the brakes we've, of course, got a bit more stability as we're going into the corner. The rear's not wanting to hop up as much. So we can actually sink our hands into the brakes a lot harder. So it's actually changing the braking points by a little bit less than what we'd expected, because our bike has improved quite substantially in that point. I'd say corner entry is exactly the same. Everything from that point on is very similar. I think it's mainly just chassis-wise that we've improved. The weight of the bike is exactly the same, the way it's going to react is very similar, if not the same.

The weight's the same?

Now we've gone four kilos, but that was quite recently that they decided to add that. The bikes were designed and built and then they go, Ah yeah, we're going to add four kilos. So I don't think that's really the right way forward. And I hope they fight it. I hope they fight it and win because you don't make rules and change it at the last minute when the bike's already developed. So I think the extra four kilos isn't changing anything like that anyway. It's more or less the same weight. If it was 20 kilos difference in the bike, it might be a bit of difference. At this point it just feels very similar to the 800. The only thing that's different for us is the way the chassis feels. Like I said, I think we've made some improvements with that. And just corner exit, we're able to use that power a lot better, we're able to get a more torque out of the engine, have a lot more control with the engine because it's not so peaky. And actually I've found a lot more traction. Because of the extra torque and control, it wants to drive out of the corner a lot longer before it spins.

Can you be less precise with the 1000 and still get away with it?

I'd say no. In a small way I think maybe, because of that extra torque you've got you can just square the corner off then and shoot it out. But the 800s already had a lot of power. And especially by the end of their time they already had a quite substantial amount and too much. You're still spinning up everywhere. So I'd say, no. I think you've still got to ride them in a very similar way. Try to ride them very accurately and everyone's just trying to massage out the bugs at the moment.

If you make a mistake, is it less forgiving than the 800?

No, I think it's very similar. The 800s, maybe you were carrying a little bit more corner speed. Because you didn't have the same power on the 800s then you didn't have the same problems with wheelies. The 1000s, of course, especially on a small track with a short gearbox, is just going to want to wheelie quite a lot, so that's going to be something you'll have to think about. So they did turn a little bit harder and you keep a little bit more throttle in the middle of the turn really. But such a minute amount. You can still ride them in exactly the same way. I was watching some of the lines out there of everybody today and looking at some of the black marks. They're using the whole track still. I'm using less and less of the track, because I'm happy with that extra bit of torque. But in general you can still ride them in both ways.

You've said that having a child is going to give more meaning to your life. When did you come to this realization?

Four years ago, I'd say. I've always known there's more to life than just racing for a long time. But when I finally decided this isn't going to be me for the rest of my life I started looking for things that I can do away from racing, that's my fishing and things like that I really enjoy. And spending as much time with friends as I can. Things I've just missed out on because this championship doesn't permit you to do that. And all my good friends race in other championships, so we're all busy on opposite weekends and we just never get time together. And you miss those things and you learn that you're supposed to appreciate the time that you've got together and try and spend as much time as you can.

You've won a title before. Is it harder to win a title or defend a title?

I think there is no defending a title. You don't go into a season with a points advantage over anyone. So I don't think it's ever a title defense. I think you've got a different number on your bike, if you choose so, but everyone starts at zero again. Especially this year; we're going from 800s to 1000s, so there's nothing similar to the past year except we're running tyres on bikes and we're doing the same kind of championship, but completely different, I suppose, category you could call it now. So, I don't think you ever go into a season trying to defend your championship. I think you're going out trying to attack for another one.

The year after you won your championship you had a number of problems, which made keeping the number one plate more difficult.

I think we didn't start out so great with the bike, the 2008 bike. We struggled with quite a lot at the start of the season. We were having a lot of pumping issues and trying to figure out with chain tensions, all that sort of thing. Even just small things like that to try to stop the slack, try to stop the pumping problems we were having. But then we had a camera come off and flap around my bike in Estoril, which no one's even realized that. We had an engine go on us in Le Mans. Then we had major issues at the end of the year with my wrist falling to pieces, but everyone just remembers me losing the title. But I think we put up one hell of a fight considering the year we had. And I think I proved to everybody that we had every right to be champion again that year, but it wasn't to be. Things didn't go right. Same in 2009. We were leading the championship when my lactose issue started to play havoc in our lives. It was pretty much only 2010 that we didn't have any excuses. We didn't have the bike, we didn't have the equipment, we didn't get it sorted quick enough. We made mistakes. Pushed too hard in places we maybe shouldn't have. And things just didn't go well from there. But we showed at the end of the season once we got everything sorted that we still had the speed and came out on a bike that hasn't given us everything we wanted, but has been a fantastic partnership with myself and my team and sort of showed everybody what we could do again.

Wayne Rainey famously said that with each passing championship he felt he had to win and that there was no settling for second place.

I think this championship's changing quite a lot. I'm looking at it in different ways, similar in some ways to Wayne. Wayne, he was the benchmark so he had nothing really to chase, but I suppose you can always win more races during the season, you've always got goals you can set. But for me, it's a problem the way the championship's sort of heading and the way there's always rule changes, there's always excuses, this, that and the other and it doesn't seem to be about racing as it was in those days and there's a lot more to it than just going out there and having a good scrap. There's just too much in between. I think if you look at things in the same sort of way, it sort of makes me unhappy looking at the way the championship, the direction that it's going. But at the same time I've still got goals that I can set this year and try and fulfill, but if I can't, I've got to be happy with the career I've had.

One of his problems was that by winning so often, there was little improvement to his machinery. That doesn't seem to be a problem with Honda.

This team, everything, every bit of input I do, you see that motivating them and trying to do better. With Honda, you see that they just want to keep improving. They don't ever want to sit still. Last year there wasn't too much to put down, but now that there's a 1000 in, straight away there's a lot of input going into it and they're trying to sort out all their small gremlins.

At Laguna Seca you had one of your most frustrating races in 2009 and last year you had one of your greatest races.

I think everyone can appreciate that maybe the race wasn't so easy on a Ducati now. That maybe it wasn't as clean cut as everyone thought it to be. I rode my butt of in that race and things didn't work out. I think we've shown everyone that doesn't really matter about that. I forgot about that shortly after and just everybody else didn't. So it's not my problem any more.

The pass that you made on Jorge Lorenzo, how far ahead did you plan that?

A few laps to be honest. Not in that exact spot; I just thought if the opportunity arose then I wouldn't have any doubt about doing it. One of the different corners that suit you better and I've always been good in the last sector of Laguna-nothing to do with the acceleration, I was fast on the Ducati. It's just all about getting the gear shifts right just to keep the front down, because it's such a short track. Gear shifts are really quick and very difficult. So I've always felt comfortable coming out of the last corner going on the main straight. On the laps previous to that I was catching Jorge every time doing that spot. And I thought if I got close enough and he just makes a small slip-up with gear shift, which it's not going to take much, but it's just enough to get me that momentum. And it happened. If you actually watch you'll see me all of a sudden sort of get an acceleration. It's not that, it's just the fact that he left that wheelie a little bit too long. Lost that little bit of momentum and that allowed me to carry that momentum around the outside.

Some believe that was the turning point in the championship? Do you agree or disagree?

No, I completely disagree. Then it turned again and it turned back again, so there's constantly turning points in the championship. I think, just let it go. Just let every race be a different turning point in the championship. It doesn't need to be, Aw that race was the turning point. There's always different moments and you just need to let them flow.

Tweet Button: 

Back to top

Comments

Thanks David for posting that up. Really enjoy Casey's interviews, down to earth and all that.

One thing I have to say however is, I feel like we see a lot more of Casey now that he's with Honda (through all these interviews and stuff) then when he was with Ducati. But that was always something that he didn't like about Ducati was the amount of PR stuff they make you do. Seems like he's doing just as much if not more with Honda. Wasn't it Capirossi who said his initial contract with Ducati required some 40+ days a year of PR obligations?

Kids (even at 26) grow up so fast in professional sport, they have extensive media commitments, intense training regimes, and a life full of goals. As professionalism has crept into the sport, has rider enjoyment decreased? Is the objective now singularly MONEY.

Casey speaks passionately about bike racing and his teams (both Honda and Ducatti) but less respectively of the championship and the camaraderie he feels on the grid.

Its this combination of having grown up so rapidly due to his elite sporting lifestyle and his lack of affection for the arena in which he competes, that leads me to believe we will not see him race for too many more years. I truly hope I'm wrong! It'll come down to a simple question "does the money compensate for the lifestyle?"...Only Casey knows the answer.

Jorge and Casey are such fabulous riders, they are both at their prime, provided neither company drops the ball mechanically, we could be in for one helluva ride this season. I'm as excited as the first time I saw Barry Sheene ride... Is it possible to enjoy a sport more as you get older? I know I now look at the calendar everyday counting down to Qatar wishing... If I can get a permsisson slip from the long suffering woman, I'll be there....

I agree but I am worried this could be the LAST year.

"I've still got goals that I can set this year and try and fulfill, but if I can't, I've got to be happy with the career I've had"

I know this can be read in other ways but it would not surprise me at all if this is it and he goes car racing in Australia there after.

I doubt that in the extreme. What world champion anything has money as their motivator? These guys first and foremost want to prove themselves to themselves, then their peers, hacks and the world at large in that order. Stoner will stay in the sport for as long as he still has goals he wants to achieve of which he has stated as much. He has matured as a person quite significantly since his first world title. Both he and Lorenzo have grown into what appear to be well rounded young men. Blokes never stop maturing by the way, and never really actually achieve it either!

Stoner has done everything young. So as gbyrnes95 states above I wondered about that line too, particularly in light of past utterances.

But then just about every great motorcycle racer on the planet has struggled with or delayed their intended retirement. It's a mighty hard drug to give up. A couple of squawking kids and Stoner might well find those weekends away from home rather sanctuary like!

Rossi moved from Honda to Yamaha because Honda did not meet his salary requirements, Yamaha paid him $12 million per annum, he's now at Ducati having had the same problem with Yamaha as at Honda, this time he is reportedly earning in excess of $20 million.

Casey earns around $6.8 million per annum, if they take it to $10 million next year, do you think it would affect his decision to stay or go? I think he would most definitely consider it.

I also think Casey's salary motivation is less than other riders, he has probably achieved financial success beyond his wildest dreams, and will chase lifestyle pleasure sooner than most suspect.

I take every opportunity I can to watch him, his true skill level is inexcess of any rider I've ever seen, Ago etc I've seen them all, but this kid is simply amazing. He can ride a bad bike fast, very fast! Freddie Spencer was close but deeply troubled unfortunately...

Squawking kids? No, he'll dote on that, his family ties are intense. His own family sold their home and took him to England at 14 (to young to road race in Australia at the time) and lived in caravan. Squawking kids on a massive property in north Queensland, Barra fishing whenever he feels like it? Adios Stoner!

You should know as well as I do that money wasn't the main factor in Rossi's Yamaha move, nor was it with his Ducati move where he squeezed himself out of Yamaha. The money is a reflection of their standing in the sport, or sometimes a reflection of ego, not the driving motivating force within per se. It's like these corporate fat cats. They all earn ridiculous amounts of money and they don't need any more. Boss X simply wants to be earning more than Boss Y.

This 'kid' became a man quite some time ago too.

If anyone thinks that Valentino's reason for moving is money, let me let you know a bit of information, that little sticker with the green M on the side of his helmet earned him at the last year with Yamaha over a quarter of his factory salary, A QUARTER, for a sticker no bigger than 2 square inches, 5.08 square centimeters, whatever, 3.3 million euros for that, money as you should know, but I don't think you care, was never the motive of his move, watch Fastest? I think not, but let me give you a clue, clue? As in you should read this in inform yourself, the clue is by watching Fastest, you will watch a segment of an interview where Valentino ( 7 time World Champion- 9 time over all World Champion) before he left Honda, before Honda found out he was leaving, he said he wasn't happy, he wasn't having fun, but then again I don't expect you to know this since your knowledge is limited by the band wagon, or by comparing Stoner with the greatest, let's not forget that the same amount of championships that said rider matches some others nobody cares about, but knowledge comes from having memories and passion for the sport as I remember being on the single digits in age, the craze and passion the came from riders such as Randy Mamola wheeling his Lucky Strike Suzuki down the straight finish lane... Read a book or something.

The official story behind the move was simple, the linking of the two great icons of Italian motorcycling, Valentino Rossi and Ducati. It was a move that had been predicted for years by bike fans, though for most of that period it was merely a product of wishful thinking. To link Rossi and Ducati was a no-brainer, an instant marking powerhouse and the embodiment of the word synergy.

The unofficial story was a little different, and rather less edifying. Rossi had been upset with Yamaha for a while, ever since they had signed Jorge Lorenzo against his express wishes. His ire was further raised by Yamaha offering Lorenzo a one-year contract, a luxury that had never been offered to Rossi. An alleged dispute over money - Yamaha cutting Rossi's pay in the name of cost-cutting, while at the same time offering Lorenzo a big pay rise - was the final straw, and Rossi reportedly issued Yamaha an ultimatum: It's him or me. Yamaha refused to choose, sticking to the line they had repeated throughout the process, that they felt there was room in the team for both men. Seeing his requests rebuffed, Rossi walked, and with Casey Stoner already signed to Honda, Ducati was his only serious option.

http://motomatters.com/report/2011/03/16/2011_motogp_season_preview_the_...

_________________________________________________________

Not to mention that Jorge Lorenzo proved that he can beat Valentino when given the same machine. On the other side, Valentino has proved that he is nothing without good machine and that his development skills are more mit than reality.

How has Rossi suddenly become the topic of this discussion ?

As others have mentioned Stoner doesn't seem to care for the motogp circus, he obviously loves winning as indicated in previous interviews when he states that his aim is to always try to win races. I think he gets much more pleasure from family life and fishing. He wont follow in the footsteps of attention seekers like Schwantz who cant stay away from the paddock after retirement

A story on one rider, whoever it is, shouldn't become a rider X vs rider Y rant, especially one that attacks other posters for their opinion.

Personally, I love watching the skill of all these guys, especially the slow motion footage - I wish there was more of it. I hope Stoner keeps on finding the challenge and enjoyment in racing MotoGP for many years, the sport would be poorer without him.

Has anyone else noticed that post-race interviews never seem to have the riders enthusing about it being a great race any more? It's a shame, it'd be great to see their faces lit up with the fun of the race, but I haven't seen it for ages.

I would say that many of them aren't "lit up with the fun of the race" because the racing quite simply.... hasn't been much fun the past few seasons

Riders are people and most people love money, it's always a choice between earning money in a way that you find acceptable, and to a limited extent find enjoyable.

To place Rossi, Stoner, etc on a pedestal and not believe that money affects their decisions is naive in the extreme. They do not risk their lives for love alone.

I used Rossi's salary increases to demonstrate that riders do consider money as highly important - I was not intending to inflame yet another debate about 'Rossi V whoever', my apologises to those that have suffered through that yet again.

I refer to Stoner as a 'kid' for two reasons, 1: he is much less than 1/2 my age, 2: I've always referred to people I like and are more than 30 years younger than me as 'kid'. I use it as a term of endearment. Is he a man? Of cause and a great one by the looks of it.

And yes I've watched Randy ride, he was great but not a patch on Freddie Spencer... my opinion with both passion and vast experience.