Guest Blog: Mat Oxley - The man who mistook his aero device for a hat

MotoMatters.com is delighted to feature the work of iconic MotoGP writer Mat Oxley. Oxley is a former racer, TT winner and highly respected author of biographies of world champions Mick Doohan and Valentino Rossi, and currently writes for Motor Sport Magazine, where he is MotoGP correspondent. We are featuring sections from Oxley's blogs, which are posted in full on the Motor Sport Magazine website.


The man who mistook his aero device for a hat

MotoGP’s aero war is raging, with Aprilia the latest to fit a swingarm device, so what’s next for the rules? Should aero stay or should it go?

These words you are reading are not part of a MotoGP article, they are the opening sentences of the first chapter of War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy.

The photo you see above is not an aerodynamic device attached to Aprilia’s RS-GP MotoGP bike for the first time during Monday’s private test at the Circuit of The Americas, it is a tyre cooler, or a swingarm stiffener, or a debris deflector, or possibly a hat.

MotoGP finds itself in a strange place at the moment, when words mean more than reality. Or perhaps the people in charge are suffering from a severe case of visual agnosia, an unusual neurological condition that leaves people unable to recognize even familiar objects.

The famous neurologist Oliver Sacks wrote a book about his experiences with patients suffering from visual agnosia. The book was titled “The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat”.

In MotoGP’s scrutineering bays and even in its Court of Appeal in Switzerland, officials are examining the latest gizmos fitted to MotoGP bikes and failing to correctly identify what they see in front of them.

During the recent Court of Appeal case to decide the fate of Ducati’s swingarm widget used in the season-opening Qatar GP, officials agreed with Ducati staff that the device was a tyre cooler and not an aerodynamic device designed to increase downforce and therefore rear grip.

Once the device had been declared legal it was obvious that rival manufacturers would make their own swingarm aero devices (sorry, tyre coolers), just as they had copied the Desmosedici’s winglets in 2016.

Read the rest of Mat Oxley's blog on the Motor Sport Magazine website.

Source: 
Total votes: 9
Total votes: 9

Back to top

Comments

The swing arm aero devices do add unsprung weight, but they are relatively light, and they are close to the swing arm pivot point, so they are not moving as much as a device attached close to the wheel axle. The front wheel covers on the Ducati are probably more of an issue there. But the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.

Total votes: 2

How long until the premier motorcycle series follows Formula 1 and has their bikes look just as ridiculous?

Both F1 and MotoGP would be better racing with no aero. Just the best athletes on the fastest vehicles.

OK. I guess this is an old fart wishing for the good old days.

Total votes: 12

In the good old days riders won by minutes didn’t they? Even in much more recent times it was common for people like Doohan to swan off into the distance and the racing was often very, very dull. Devices like this don’t change that the racing over the last 3 or 4 years is the best it’s ever been.

Total votes: 4

The weight is very minimal since it’s carbon fiber. The real benefit (other than “tire cooling”) is that it most likely adds unsprung downforce. The downforce doesn’t have to travel through the suspension to earn its effect. 

Total votes: 4

That's only completely true if the device is mounted at the axle. The closer it is to the swingarm pivot, the more the force is transmitted through the suspension. At the pivot, it's 100% sprung.

Total votes: 4